Sig Sauer Serial Number Search

Dec 10, 2020 Sep 19, 2017 - A mandatory Sig Sauer recall has been issued for three rifle models that. From there, utilize the serial number identifier and visual inspection. The SIG Sauer P238 is a compact. 1987 Komfort Travel Trailer Owners Manual. 380 ACP caliber, single-action pistol announced by SIG. P238 pistol manufactured by SIG Sauer, Rosewood variant. Every Sig Sauer gun has a serial number engraved on it. With this serial number, you can call Sig Sauer customer service and request the date of manufacture of the gun. Inspect the firearm for the serial number. Depending on your specific gun, the serial number is found on the side of the barrel, the trigger guard or the receiver.

Sig Sauer P226 Serial Number Search
Sig Sauer Serial Number Search Online
Sig Sauer Serial Number Lookup P220

Actually, SIG only charges $12.95 to tell you when your SIG was made. They also mail you a Certificate of Manufacture. Call SIG Customer Service to order yours. You will need to know the model number (e.g., P226) and the serial number of the weapon to order this certificate. It is an opportunity for us to reflect on the. How to tell when my sig was made, sig p320 serial number search, sig sauer mosquito serial number, sig sauer p226 serial number lookup, sig sauer serial numberStatistical Techniques Statistical Mechanics Our Word of the Year choice serves as a symbol of each years most.

If you’ve heard someone mention proof marks or date codes when discussing a SIG Sauer pistol, but weren’t quite sure what those were, then the goal of this article is to bring you up to speed. And even if you’re already familiar with proof marks, maybe this article can broaden your knowledge and teach you something new.

What are Proof Marks?

Proof marks are stamps embedded in certain parts of a firearm following (and sometimes during, depending on the firearm type) its manufacturing to indicate that the firearm has been “proven” to be able to handle the specific type of ammunition for which it was designed. In modern years, they truly do serve that purpose. But like many government regulations, their origins have more to do with self-interest than safety.

The first proof marks started appearing in 15th century France, and by the 17th century, European firearms guildsmen were heavily promoting their use — and lobbying their governments for laws requiring them — primarily to dissuade competition from non-guildsmen and scare potential purchasers away from un-proofed guns.

In 1637, after heavy lobbying from the London Gunmakers Company, a London-area firearms guild, King Charles I issued a Royal Charter setting firearms safety standards. The London Gunmakers Company set up a “proof house” in London, and not surprisingly… firearms makers who were not part of a guild tended to fail testing more often than the guild members. Guns that passed testing were stamped with a mark representing the proof house. Over the next few decades, other countries established their own safety standards and proof houses, along with their own unique marks. Much like reciprocity of modern concealed carry permits between states, some European countries began to recognize each others’ proof marks as a high enough testing standard for foreign countries’ firearms to be legally imported.

Fast forward to 1914, when a number of European countries formed the CIP (Commission Internationale Permanente pour l’Epreuve des Armes à Feu Portatives) as a formal standards group to ensure consistent testing among member countries. As of 2015, the CIP includes 14 member states. In order for a civilian firearm produced in a CIP member state to be legally imported to another CIP country, it must bear the proof mark of a CIP member state (military testing standards are, predictably, different than civilian ones). The United States does not participate in CIP, but instead formed its own standards group named SAAMI (Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute). While the CIP and SAAMI do share information and cooperate, neither has a requirement regarding selling in each other’s countries. Because the US is not a CIP member state, foreign guns do not need a CIP proof mark to be sold in the US, nor do US guns need a US proof mark to be sold in CIP member countries. This is an important fact that will become relevant again later in this article.

Examples of German Proof Marks

Here’s an assortment of mid 20th century proof marks used through Germany’s (and West Germany’s) history:

The top row (a) indicates the German (or East/West German, depending on the year) city in which the proof house is located. The column marked (b) shows varios German/West German proof marks after 1945, while the column marked (c) shows German proof marks used from 1939-1945.

Here’s another image showing the marks of German/West German proof houses, along with the approximate year they were first in use:

Proof Marks on SIG Sauer Pistols

Depending on it’s vintage and model, you might see proof marks on a German / West German SIG’s frame:

Proof mark on a West German P220 frame

Or on its barrel:On the slide chin (the underside of the slide near the muzzle end), which is the most common location for West German and German SIG Sauers:

Proof marks on the slide chin of a West German SIG Sauer pistol

To make sense of these proof marks, let’s look at those on the above slide chin.

Kiel Proof House Mark

The top proof mark indicates the Kiel Proof House. Since Kiel is only 17 miles from SIG Sauer’s manufacturing facility in Eckernförde, that’s the proof mark you should expect to see on a proofed SIG Sauer. Many refer to the Kiel mark as a “squashed bug,” while others have claimed it’s an oak leaf. Actually, the proof mark is based on the city of Kiel’s coat of arms:

…which in turn is based on the district of Schaumburg’s coat of arms:

Coat of arms of Schaumburg

The shape represents a Nesselblatt, or nettle leaf. Tradition held that the leaves of the nettle were symbolic of the nails used to crucify Christ, so the three larger leaves represent the nails of the crucifixion.

All true German and West German SIGs were test fired at the Kiel proof house, so the Nesselblatt proof mark is an indicator of a true German or West German SIG. I’ve also heard one report of the Ulm proof house’s stag antler mark appearing on a the frame and slide of a 1993 SIG P226 (in addition to the Kiel mark on the slide), which would imply that the firearm required repair and re-proofing… and presumably the repair took place at a location that was closer to Ulm than Kiel. Normally, you’d expect to see the Ulm proof mark on a Walther or H&K firearm.

The German Definitive Mark and Nitro Testing

Underneath the Kiel Nesselblatt (though the order of the marks is not important), we find the image of an eagle with the letter “N” underneath. Some incorrectly believe that the eagle mark is a remnant of Nazi-era Germany, particularly since Germany’s firearms proof mark was a previously crown, and was changed to an eagle in 1939.

In actuality, the German Reichsadler (literally “Eagle of the Realm”) dates back to the eagle on the standard of the Roman Empire, and was used as a symbol of the Second German Empire as early as 1871… long before the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. The same eagle design has continued its use in West Germany since 1945, but under a new name of Bundesadler, or “Union Eagle.”

The Eagle-N mark signifies that the firearm was proofed in Germany (or West Germany, depending on when the firearm was proofed), while the “N” indicates that the firearm was proofed using a Nitro Beschuss load. “Beschuss” translates as “bombardment,” “shelling,” or “firing” depending on context, and “nitro” is short for “nitrocellulose,” a highly flammable compound used to creates pressures inside the firearm higher than standard gun powder.

Pistols are delivered to the proof houses in their fully assembled form for proofing. For pistols, CIP standards require cartridges that generate pressure 30% higher than the standard ammunition for which the pistol is designed, so the two high pressure nitro rounds are fired through the pistol. Technicians then disassemble the pistol and examine it in a dark room using a fluoroscopic lamp, looking for magnetic flux leakage. Provided everything looks good, the pistol is re-assembled and receives the country’s CIP proof mark indicating what type of test it passed (the Eagle-N or “definitive” mark in the case of a German gun), the mark of the proof house, and marks indicating the date of the tests. The firearms is then returned to the manufacturer who can legally sell the firearm domestically or export it to another CIP country.

The “nitro” proof mark is also referred to as the “definitive” (or final) mark of the proof house, as opposed to a “provisional” mark which would generally only apply to shotgun barrels in an early stage of manufacture, which are tested at proof houses to prevent the manufacturer from continuing work on defective tubes.

Date Codes

Looking back at our photo, the “JK” under the definitive proof mark is the date code. Date codes are two-letter indicators of the year that a firearm was proofed. Major German firearms companies such as Heckler and Koch, Walther, and SIG Sauer all used a similar date code format:

German gun manufacturers used these letters in place of numbers for date codes

Just to keep things interesting, SIG Sauer chose not to use the letter “I” because it looked too much like the numeral “1,” so J = 8 in SIG speak. The proof house in Koln (Cologne), Germany also follows this format. Walther and Heckler & Koch chose to use “I” for 8 but skip “J,” except that you will see a “J” on an H&K magazine’s date code. Gotta love German logic. 🙂

Using the above table, we can determine that the “JK” date code in the photo stands for “89” — meaning this firearm was proofed in 1989… which coincidentally happened to be the year the Berlin Wall came down. This doesn’t necessarily mean that the pistol was manufactured in 1989. It’s quite possible the barrel was made in 1986, the frame in 1987, and the slide in 1988… but that all the parts weren’t assembled together into a firearm and delivered to a proof house until 1989. Or it’s possible that all the parts were actually made in 1989, and then assembled and proofed that same year. There’s no way to know. A true German / West German firearm isn’t technically “born” until it’s been proofed.

Note that a gun’s date code is different than its serial number. It’s impossible to decode a SIG serial number to determine when it was proofed, although you can try to locate the range of your SIG’s serial number in this list to approximate when it was made, or call SIG Sauer with the serial number and see if they have any info in their system. Serial numbers aren’t always truly representative of the chronological order of a firearm, but they can sometimes get you close. Only a date code can tell you the year of proofing.

Proofed vs. Non-Proofed “Made in Germany” Guns

If you’ve read my article on West German vs. German vs. Other SIGs, you’ll know that proof marks are one of the primary indicators or whether a SIG Sauer (or any other firearm) is truly “made” in Germany (or West Germany) as opposed to assembled in the US using German-made parts… even though the parts might be stamped “Made in Germany.” Because the US is not a CIP country, guns marked “Made in Germany” do not need to be proofed in order to be sold here, as long as they are assembled in the US.

In my opinion, a gun without German proof marks (with very few exceptions) is not truly a German gun. Whether that actually affects the desirability or quality of the gun is for you to decide. But you should at least be aware that for most SIG purists, the existence of proof marks is what determines whether a gun is correctly referred to as “Made in Germany.”

Putting it All Together

Now that you know how to decode proof marks and date codes, see if you can figure out where and when the following firearms were proofed. Most are SIGs, but I threw some other German guns in there just for fun. 🙂

Normally, the proof house mark is above the definitive mark on a SIG, but this is a very early SIG P220

Walther P99

I welcome your corrections, questions, comments, & feedback below.

Sig Sauer P226 Serial Number Search

However, getting a newbie to this process I had been not aware of every details to appear into. Upon delivery of the tool I questioned to open up the case and examine the gun and magazines et all.

I WAS NOT aware to examine the case and look for the manufacturé date. My January 2016 bought yielded at January 2013 tool. At very first I was a little bit pérturbed by this as (1) I compensated 2016 prices for a 2013 design (2) I would choose a design with the latest design and manufacturing updates as occurs from period to period. So I called Sig CS today and told them of my issues and gave them the SN. They verified it has been produced in January. 2013 but also stated that both season models are usually EXACTLY the same.

What do you men think about that declaration? Are they the same? Hitman blood money download for pc ocean of games. If so, my problem will go out the doorway. But I wouldn't want to pay 2016 Mercedes prices for a 2013 model. I simply published the right after on an old line - plz forgive the repeat but I thought I'd répost in this néwer twine: /./ On Wednesday of this week I picked up my 1st hand gun - G229R. I researched online between all 9mmichael makes and models and after that fired the top contenders at the variety. However, getting a newbie to this process I was not conscious of every detail to look into.

Upon delivery of the weapon I inquired to open the case and examine the firearm and periodicals et all. I Had been NOT aware to inspect the situation and appear for the manufacturé date. My Jan 2016 purchased yielded at Jan 2013 weapon. At first I has been a little bit pérturbed by this as (1) I paid 2016 costs for a 2013 design (2) I would choose a design with the most recent design and manufacturing updates as occurs from time to period.

So I known as Sig CS today and told them of my issues and gave them the SN. They verified it was manufactured in January.

2013 but also mentioned that both season models are EXACTLY the same. What do you guys believe about that declaration? Are they the exact same? If therefore, my issue will go out the doorway. But I wouldn't would like to spend 2016 Mercedes costs for a 2013 model. There are a lot of new guns that just have ended up sitting around somewhere unfired, uninterrupted, in dealers' stock. So, they are still considered NIB, New Aged Share, etc.

I would not really be concerned at all abóut it, if l were in your shoes. Unless they looked up the build records for two specific serial numbers, I'd suppose that 'EXACTLY' is subject to small variations. On the exact same model (component number, also, it appears) produced at different instances, they may switch out what grips are utilized, or the cause slim vs. There are unmarketed changes from period to time, and actually when specs on the web site are various, the web site may not really get up to date. This shouldn'capital t become an problem if you examined your gun before transferring it, and Iiked what you got.

Nothing impacting the basic operation should happen. If you were to buy online structured on pictures from the vendor or from Sig's i9000 web site or directory, and obtained something different from whatever warehouse it came out of, if that's i9000 a problem for you, don't exchange it. FWIW, I've known as Sig consumer service twice and found opposite ends of the spectrum as significantly as item knowledge and helpfulness on the additional finish. There are usually a lot of new guns that just have been sitting down around somewhere unfired, uninterrupted, in dealers' supply. Therefore, they are still considered NIB, New Old Share, etc. I would not really be concerned at all abóut it, if l had been in your shoes and boots. Individually, I would have needed a price decrease for NOS.as I received on my G229r a several years back.

The seller actually offered the price reduction as he has been eradicating out some 'dormant' share of various firearms. At that period, I hadn't observed a 229r with anything other than MSRP accessible, so I jumped at it. It's i9000 nevertheless my favorite SIG(I possess it chambered in 9mmeters and 22lr with a half-dozen magazines for each). Neighbors, a quick notice to the seller might obtain you 'something'. Simply allow them understand you had been planning on a more fresh firearm and are a little surprised to obtain one that's currently 3 years previous. Can'testosterone levels harm.you might end up with a free of charge extra magazine or something.or not really.

I just posted the pursuing on an older line - plz forgive the do it again but I believed I'd répost in this néwer twine: /./ On Tuesday of this 7 days I picked up my 1st hand gun - P229R. I investigated online between all 9mm makes and models and after that fired the top contenders at the range.

However, getting a newbie to this process I has been not conscious of every details to appear into. Upon shipping of the weapon I questioned to open the situation and inspect the gun and periodicals et all. I WAS NOT conscious to examine the situation and look for the manufacturé date. My January 2016 purchased yielded at Jan 2013 weapon.

At first I has been a bit pérturbed by this as (1) I paid 2016 prices for a 2013 design (2) I would choose a design with the most recent style and manufacturing upgrades as occurs from period to period. So I known as Sig CS nowadays and informed them of my problems and offered them the SN. They verified it has been produced in Jan. 2013 but also mentioned that both 12 months models are usually EXACTLY the same. What perform you guys think about that statement?

Are usually they the exact same? If so, my issue will go out the doorway. But I wouldn't desire to spend 2016 Mercedes prices for a 2013 design. I simply posted the pursuing on an old line - plz forgive the repeat but I believed I'd répost in this néwer twine: /./ On Wednesday of this week I selected up my 1st hand gun - G229R.

I researched online between all 9mm makes and versions and after that terminated the best opportunities at the range. However, becoming a newbie to this process I was not aware of every fine detail to look into. Upon delivery of the tool I inquired to open up the situation and inspect the firearm and magazines et all. I WAS NOT conscious to inspect the situation and look for the manufacturé date. My Jan 2016 purchased yielded at Jan 2013 weapon. At 1st I has been a little bit pérturbed by this as (1) I compensated 2016 costs for a 2013 design (2) I would choose a model with the most recent design and production enhancements as occurs from period to time. So I called Sig CS nowadays and informed them of my issues and provided them the SN.

They verified it has been produced in Jan. 2013 but furthermore mentioned that both 12 months models are EXACTLY the exact same.

What do you men think about that declaration? Are usually they the same? If therefore, my concern goes out the doorway. But I wouldn't wish to spend 2016 Mercedes prices for a 2013 model. There are a great deal of fresh weapons that simply have happen to be seated around someplace unfired, uninterrupted, in sellers' inventory. Therefore, they are usually still regarded as NIB, New Old Stock, etc.

I would not really be worried at all abóut it, if l were in your sneakers. Unless they appeared up the build records for two particular serial quantities, I'd suppose that 'EXACTLY' is usually subject matter to small variations. On the exact same design (part number, even, it appears) manufactured at different situations, they may change out what grabs are utilized, or the result in slim vs.

There are unmarketed modifications from time to period, and actually when specifications on the web site are usually various, the web site may not really get up to date. This shouldn'testosterone levels be an problem if you checked out your pistol before moving it, and Iiked what you got. Nothing impacting the essential operation should occur. If you had been to purchase online centered on pictures from the seller or from Sig'h web web site or list, and got something various from whatever factory it arrived out of, if that't a problem for you, don't exchange it. FWIW, I've called Sig client service twice and discovered opposite ends of the range as considerably as item knowledge and helpfulness on the other end. There are a great deal of brand-new weapons that simply have been sitting down around somewhere unfired, uninterrupted, in dealers' supply.

Therefore, they are still considered NIB, New Old Share, etc. I would not really be worried at all abóut it, if l had been in your shoes or boots. Individually, I would have wanted a price reduction for NOS.as I received on my P229r a few years back. The vendor actually provided the price decrease as he was cleaning out some 'dormant' share of various weapons. At that time, I hadn't seen a 229r with anything various other than MSRP obtainable, so I jumped at it. It's still my preferred SIG(I have got it chambered in 9mm and 22ll with a half-dozen mags for each).

Neighbors, a quick take note to the seller might obtain you 'something'. Just let them know you were expecting a more fresh firearm and are usually a little surprised to get one that's already 3 yrs outdated. Can't harm.you might finish up with a free of charge extra mag or something.or not really.

If you have got any information to lead for any SIG versions, please posting it in this thread, and I'll create the appropriate upgrades. Sorry, but I will not really be upgrading the G229 list. Anyone who seems like getting on that part is free of charge to do so. Initially submitted on Nov 30, 2009 Thanks a lot to this discussion board, I purchased my 1st pistol, a G220.which offers subsequently brought to a healthful obsession with various models, generally old school P220's and P226's. I've compiled a pretty decent listing of serial quantities and their related schedules of import and/or manufacture, and wish this helps those who may end up being looking for such solutions/information.

Sig Sauer Date Of Manufacture

There are usually discrepancies here and presently there in respect to sequential numbéring and the connected manufacture/transfer years, which isn't unheard of, ánd could end up being for a variety of factors not associated to falsehoods. I've performed my greatest to toss out as much rubbish as possible, while nevertheless keeping related details - some of which can be quite redundant. If there are two Times's instead of the date code, it't because I was never capable to confirm what the actual stamp was. If there are usually dashes, the gun was created without like proof marks. I've omitted total serial figures in some situations, so as not to aggrieved anyone who may have the real pistols, that prefer such details not be disclosed.

My apologies to anyone searching for schedules after the decades listed here, but I just never discovered any interest in newer Sigs. I possess a 229R with SN beginning AAU-XXXXX. I put on't notice a manufacturing date on the brand. Azure 'Sigarms' container. Bought brand-new in 2008. It would appear fairly low-numbered in this series.

I put on't discover this prefix shown. Nitron surface finish. Manual is certainly 'Gigabyte/F'; British/French.

I have got a 239 with SN beginning SA4-XXXXXX from Summer, 2008. Azure 'Sig Sauer' Package. You have this prefix, but on 2003 2006 models.